USPTO serial 77770255
ROVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R. Strack
410 JERICHO TPKE STE 220JERICHO, NY 11753-1318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Dispensers made primarily of metal, namely, paper cup dispensers; bathroom and lavatory accessories and hardware made primarily of metal, namely, lavatory partitions and doors, grab bars, guard and hand railings, protective corner guards, metal tie hooks; janitorial accessories and hardware, namely, metal hooks and brackets for storing ladders, pails, rags, towels, vacuum cleaner components and mops; telephone structures, namely, interior and exterior telephone enclosures and booths made primarily of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Shower enclosures, namely, stalls; parts for shower stalls, namely, metal partitions and doors | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Tissue receptacles made primarily of metal; toothbrush holders made primarily of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Specialties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Specialties, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ROVAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |