Drawing for SKYADS

USPTO serial 77771819

SKYADS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYADS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary E. Cabanski

Mary E. Cabanski CARR & FERRELL LLP120 CONSTITUTION DRIVEMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and advertisement services; Advertising and business services, namely, securing airtime on all forms of media communications stations, systems, networks and services for the purpose of promoting the goods and services of others; Advertising and commercial information services, via the internet, Advertising business especially in the field of telematic and telephone networks; Advertising by transmission of on-line publicity for third parties through electronic communications networks; Advertising services, Advertising via electronic media and specifically the internetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 5, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 19, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 30, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 29, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 27, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 29, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 29, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance