Drawing for BOODELOOT.COM

USPTO serial 77771855

BOODELOOT.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOODELOOT.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy V. Stephens

NANCY V. STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER PLLC1111 3RD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-3264UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of movies, books, music, television, theatre, recreational facilities, educational services, sports and entertainers; Education services, namely, providing online informational workshops in the fields of finance, financial responsibility, consumer awareness, fashion, employment, computing, technology, shopping, theatre, health, recreation, automotives, mobility, communication, electronics, education, art and sports; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials featuring fashion trends and consumer trends; Entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; Providing on-line reviews of computer games; Providing on-line reviews of electronic computer games; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; Providing a web site where users can post ratings, reviews and recommendations on events and activities in the field of entertainment and education; Entertainment and educational services, namely, providing a website that displays various requests, reviews, recommendations, rankings, trackings, votes, and information relating to new products, services, and events in the fields of pop culture, entertainment, education, lifestyle, and sports, all exclusively for non-business and non-commercial transactions and purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 16, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance