USPTO serial 77772398
BGM GEOMEMBRANES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2011
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BGM GEOMEMBRANES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Strasbourg 67100, FR
Strasbourg 67100, FR
Strasbourg 67100, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnaud Rainfray
Arnaud Rainfray O'Brien Barristers and Solicitors LLP140 Grande-Allee Est, office 600Quebec City, G1R5M8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Bituminous geomembranes for civil engineering structures, namely, bridges, roads, dams, mine tailing impoundments, water reservoirs, waste burial sites and canals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |