Drawing for CHEF ELECT

USPTO serial 77772873

CHEF ELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEF ELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell P. Novick, Esq.

MITCHELL P. NOVICK, ESQ. LAW OFFICES OF MITCHELL P. NOVICK623 EAGLE ROCK AVE STE 407WEST ORANGE, NJ 07052-2948UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric kitchen tools, namely, knives, mixers, electric food choppers, electric can openers, electric juice extractorsACTIVE—
008non-electric kitchen tools, namely, potato peelers, and paring knivesACTIVE—
011electric cooking utensils, namely, coffee makers, toasters, slow cookers, ironsACTIVE—
021kitchen utensils, namely, spatulas, food tongs, skewers, vegetable toppers, and basting brushes; cooking utensils, namely, grills, woks, fish baskets, burger baskets, and hot dog baskets; bakeware; and dinnerware; non-electric kitchen tools, namely, hand mixersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 18, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 30, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance