Drawing for BLACK LAVA JAVA

USPTO serial 77772929

BLACK LAVA JAVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACK LAVA JAVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Christopher Baker

David Christopher Baker Hart, King & Coldren200 Sandpointe, 4th FloorSanta Ana, CA 92707UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030COFFEE, COFFEE BEANS, AND GROUND COFFEEACTIVESep 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 16, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 16, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 21, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 21, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 21, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 20, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 20, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance