USPTO serial 77773288
SSR GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2011
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SSR GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Seoul, KR
Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Chunan-si, KR
Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Chunan-si, KR
Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shoes; [ Iron fitting for shoes; ] non-slipping devices for shoes; welts for shoes; beach shoes; bath sandals; bath slippers; [ boots for sports; gymnastic shoes, half-boots; heelpieces for shoes; ] heels; lace boots; leather shoes; [ leather slippers; ] mules in the nature of footwear; clogs in the nature of footwear; boot uppers; boots; [ heelpieces for boots; iron fittings for boots; non-slipping devices for boots, namely, rubber soles; ski boots; ] welts for boots; esparto shoes or sandals; [ fittings of metal for shoes and boots; football boots; studs for football boots; ] sports shoes; [ football shoes; foot muffs not electrically heated; ] footwear; tips for footwear; footwear uppers; backless shoes; shoes made of rubber; overshoes; deck shoes; hiking boots; hiking shoes; [ rock-climbing shoes; ] motorcycle boots; [ ballet slippers; ballet shoes; boxing shoes; volleyball shoes; cleats for attachment to sports shoes; cycling shoes; ] track shoes; [ track spikes in the nature of footwear; racing flats in the nature of shoes; ] tennis shoes; sneakers in the nature of footwear; [ shoes made of vinyl; ] wedge shoes; [ wooden-soled shoes; wooden-soled sandals; inserts in the nature of insertable slip-resistant interior liners for footwear; ] flip-flops in the nature of footwear; straw sandals; wedge shoes; thong sandals; [ field hockey shoes; handball shoes; lacrosse shoes; basketball shoes; wrestling shoes; ] moccasins in the nature of footwear; patent leather shoes; [ saddle shoes; ] work boots; spandex shoes; riding shoes; anti-slip soles for footwear; baseball shoes; [ bowling shoes; ] laced boots; nonslipping devices for shoes and sandals, namely, soles and insoles; [ removable soles for boots or shoes; strap-on soles for boots or shoes; wading boots; soccer cleats; ] steel-toe boots; boots in the nature of shoes; soles for footwear; sports boots; sandals; [ wooden shoes ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shin Dong Hae International Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SSR GRIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |