USPTO serial 77774141
CANNACEUTICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANNACEUTICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy Lord
NANCY LORD NANCY LORD, LTD1970 N LESLIE ST # 220PAHRUMP, NV 89060-3678UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Conducting educational exhibitions in the nature of lectures, seminars and workshops in the field of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Education in the fields of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance rendered through correspondence courses; Education services, namely, one-on-one mentoring in the fields of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Education services, namely, providing live and on-line instruction in the field of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Education services, namely, providing tutorial sessions in the fields of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Education services, namely, providing tutoring in the fields of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Education services, namely, providing instruction in the fields of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Education services, namely, training educators to teach through service learning and civic engagement and providing curricula in connection therewith; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for others in the field of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance; Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, presentations and retreats dealing with issues of concern for caregivers, partners, wives and husbands of the chronically ill and/or disabled; Entertainment and educational services, namely, the presentation of seminars, lectures, workshops and panel discussions, and ongoing television and radio talk shows all in the field of public interest concerning medical cannabis, complementary and alternative therapeutics, horticulture, legal and regulatory compliance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |