USPTO serial 77774901
PLIABLE COMPUTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLIABLE COMPUTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGG ZEGARELLI
GREGG ZEGARELLI ZEGARELLI LAW GROUP429 FORBES AVE STE 1212PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1625UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING, NAMELY, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF IDENTIFICATION, SUPPORT, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER-BASED INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR BUSINESSES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; INTEGRATION, MONITORING, ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PROVIDING QUALITY ASSURANCE OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DATA RECOVERY SERVICES, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES AND SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION; DOMAIN NAME ACQUISITION SERVICES; COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, HELP DESK SERVICES; SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, INTEGRATION, MONITORING, ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTALLATION, SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, INTRANETS DEVELOPMENT, CONTENT MANAGEMENT, NETWORK ADMINISTRATION, SERVER AND DESKTOP MANAGEMENT, FIREWALL INSTALLATION AND ADMINISTRATION; CLOUD COMPUTING FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, FOR USE AS A SPREADSHEET, FOR WORD PROCESSING, FOR ELECTRONIC MAIL, TASK AND CALENDAR MANAGEMENT, DATA ARCHIVING, COMPUTER RESOURCE MONITORING, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, REMOTE ACCESS, CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM), ACCOUNTING AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP), WINDOWS SERVERS, SQL SERVERS, APPLICATION SERVERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, WEBSITE HOSTING SERVICES, APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP), NAMELY, HOSTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS; PROVIDING ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, FOR USE AS A SPREADSHEET, FOR WORD PROCESSING, FOR ELECTRONIC MAIL, TASK AND CALENDAR MANAGEMENT, DATA ARCHIVING, COMPUTER RESOURCE MONITORING, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, REMOTE ACCESS, CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM), ACCOUNTING AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP), WINDOWS SERVERS, SQL SERVERS, APPLICATION SERVERS; SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE FOR ELECTRONIC MAIL, TASK AND CALENDAR MANAGEMENT, DATA ARCHIVING, COMPUTER RESOURCE MONITORING, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, REMOTE ACCESS, CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM), ACCOUNTING AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP), WINDOWS SERVERS, SQL SERVERS, APPLICATION SERVERS; HARDWARE AS A SERVICE AND INFRASTRUCTURE AS A SERVICE, NAMELY PROVIDING COMPUTER HARDWARE RESOURCES AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS HARDWARD AND SOFTWARE AS AN OUTSOURCED SERVICE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, HOSTING AND MAINTAINING AN ON-LINE WEB SITE FOR OTHERS TO USE IN DATABASE AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, FOR USE AS A SPREADSHEET, FOR WORD PROCESSING, FOR ELECTRONIC MAIL, TASK AND CALENDAR MANAGEMENT, DATA ARCHIVING, COMPUTER RESOURCE MONITORING, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, REMOTE ACCESS, CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM), ACCOUNTING AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP), WINDOWS SERVERS, SQL SERVERS, APPLICATION SERVERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEB-BASED SYSTEM AND ONLINE PORTAL FOR CUSTOMERS TO REMOTELY MANAGE, ADMINISTER, MODIFY AND CONTROL THEIR END USER COMPUTER DEVICES, DATA AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION IN CLASS 42 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |