USPTO serial 77774998
IMC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard G. Heywood
2104 MEADOW RIDGE DRINNSBROOK, MO 63390-6521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | Indicating membership in a(n) to indicate membership in applicants organization of industrial and municipal cleaning companies trained in the safe use of high-powered industrial cleaning techniques and/or applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |