USPTO serial 77775469
BIKANERVALA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIKANERVALA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW DELHI 110035, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Class 30: Confectionary, namely, mithai; pastry; cakes; etc.; sweets; snacks made from cereal; biscuits; bread; pastries; cakes; chips, namely, potato chips, chocolate chips etc.; chutneys; condiments, namely, mustard, pepper sauce, etc.; spices; cookies; corn flakes; crackers; curry; flour for food; frozen yoghurt; ice cream; halva; ketchup; fruit jelly; pasta; peppermint sweets; pizza; seasoning; sauces; sweetmeats; tea; coffee | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Cafes; cafeterias; bar services; catering; restaurants; snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |