Drawing for PUMPKIN PATCH PALS

USPTO serial 77777872

PUMPKIN PATCH PALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUMPKIN PATCH PALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine E. Maxson

Catherine E. Maxson Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio tapes, video tapes and DVDs featuring music, animation, and children's entertainment; motion picture films featuring children's entertainment and animationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 3, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 24, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 14, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 11, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 10, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 10, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 10, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 8, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2009CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Dec 8, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Aug 12, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance