USPTO serial 77778159
BOOTS & BARKLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOOTS & BARKLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Dunn Wessberg
Ann Dunn Wessberg TARGET BRANDS, INC.1000 NICOLLET MALLTPS-3165MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Pet stain removers; pet odor removers; deodorizers for pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Vitamins for pets; herbal anti-itch and sore skin ointment for pets; dietary supplements for pets; deodorizers for household pet litter boxes; medicated grooming preparations for pets, namely, conditioners, flea and tick medications, eardrops, eye drops, skin care preparations, dental rinse | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Metal pet tags; common metal bands for the identification of pet animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Disposable housebreaking pads for pets; paper pet crate mats | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Hats and boots; pet tags specially adapted for attaching to pet leashes or collars; pet collar accessories, namely, bells, silencers, safety lights and blinkers, pendants and charms | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal pet tags; pet ramps; crates | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Pet blankets; fabric housebreaking pads for pets, namely, reusable housebreaking pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Target Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Target Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named BOOTS & BARKLEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |