USPTO serial 77778219
FIREFLY LED LIGHTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3941357Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2011
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FIREFLY LED LIGHTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
AUSTIN, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric light bulbs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 24, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by High Tech Design Safety, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by High Tech Design Safety, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by High Tech Design Safety, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FIREFLY LED LIGHTING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named FIREFLY LED LIGHTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |