USPTO serial 77778502
SPRINGBOARD CONTROL CONSOLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPRINGBOARD CONTROL CONSOLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Lacey, Esq.
BRIAN E. LACEY, ESQ. WALTERSLACEY LLP7 FEDERAL ST STE 26DANVERS, MA 01923-3620UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, in the form of the provision of security protocols for an online Application Service Provider and management enterprise software, namely, providing custom-configured authentication protocols to allow confidentiality of data, integrity of processed data availability of data to authenticated end users in the fields of manufacturing, services industries and government to facilitate access to programs in order to better serve and render efficient individual clients' project and infrastructure management and real-time support | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, in the form of the provision of security protocols for an online Application Service Provider and management enterprise software, namely, providing custom-configured authentication protocols to allow confidentiality of data, integrity of processed data availability of data to authenticated end users in the fields of manufacturing, services industries and government to facilitate access to programs in order to better serve and render efficient individual clients' project and infrastructure management and real-time support | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
| 042 | Computer services, providing security protocols and standards for such matters as business continuity planning, systems access controls, system development and maintenance, physical and environmental security, compliance matters, personnel security, security organization, computer and operations management, asset classification and control and security policy, driven by customer needs for an online application service provider and management enterprise software and to provide client data confidentiality, availability and protection, for authenticated end users in the fields of manufacturing, services industries, including, but not limited to, architecture, engineering, construction, energy, utilities, heavy equipment, financial services, aerospace, real estate development, and government in International Class 42 | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LoadSpring Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPRINGBOARD CONTROL CONSOLE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |