USPTO serial 77780823
PC LAPTOPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PC LAPTOPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Jordan, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig J. Madson
MADSON IP PC4006.3.2P O BOX 180 255 SOUTH HOUND STREETMORGAN, UT 84050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Retail store services in the field of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | Jan 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 10, 2011 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |