USPTO serial 77781016
GROOVETOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GROOVETOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent LaBarge
Brent LaBarge Universal Music Group2220 Colorado AvenueSanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Delivery of programmed digital music by electronic transmission to subscribers; transmission of programmed videos for display to subscribers; delivery of specially programmed digital music by electronic transmission to commercial and industrial establishments; delivery of pre-planned, taped foreground digital music by electronic transmission to commercial and industrial businesses; streaming of pre-planned, taped foreground music on the Internet for businesses; delivery of specially programmed background digital music by electronic transmission from central locations to stores, restaurants, homes, hotels, banks, railroads, airlines, boats, transportation terminals, factories and other industrial establishments; leasing of audio communication equipment for playback of pre-recorded audio recordings | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Production of television and radio programs; distribution of television and radio programs for others; production and publishing of music; providing online entertainment, namely, providing non-downloadable prerecorded sound and video recordings in the field of music and music-based entertainment; entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable prerecorded musical sound and video recordings and sound recordings featuring sound effects and musical effects via a global computer network; fan clubs; development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of music and entertainment; radio entertainment production and distribution of radio programs for others; audio and sound recording and production; record production; videotape production; production of motion picture films; distribution of motion picture films; television program syndication; entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of music and music-related entertainment; entertainment, namely, continuing music and music-related entertainment shows distributed over television, satellite, audio and video media; publication of books and magazines; entertainment in the nature of ongoing radio programs in the field of music and music-related entertainment; entertainment in the nature of live music concerts and live performances by musical artists and groups; entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by musical groups, musical artists and celebrities; entertainment services in the nature of live performances by musical artists for broadcast and distribution through the medium of television, radio, and audio and video recordings; entertainment services, namely, performances by musical artists rendered live and recorded for future distribution; educational and entertainment services, namely, production and presentation of television shows, sports events, fashion shows, game shows, music shows, award shows and comedy shows before live audiences which are all broadcast live or taped for later broadcast; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring multimedia materials featuring music and music-related entertainment, musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, and photographs; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of music, musical artists and music videos; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of music festivals; entertainment services, namely, conducting exhibitions in the field of music and the arts; organizing exhibitions for entertainment purposes featuring music and the arts; publishing of web magazines; online music services, namely, providing electronic library services which feature non-downloadable prerecorded musical sound recordings, musical effects and sound effects via an online computer network; providing an online searchable database featuring cataloged and indexed non-downloadable prerecorded music, musical effects and sound effects; publication of music books, musical compositions books and sheets, musical arrangements books and sheets and musical text; music composition for others; production of programmed music and videos for display to subscribers; audio and video recording and production for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Music - MGB NA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Music - MGB NA LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GROOVETOWN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |