Drawing for SHMIRSHKY

USPTO serial 77781079

SHMIRSHKY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHMIRSHKY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lindy M. Herman

Lindy M. Herman Rutan & Tucker, LLP611 Anton Boulevard14th FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Traveling bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 1, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 7, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance