Drawing for SENIOR QUARTERS

USPTO serial 77781262

SENIOR QUARTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENIOR QUARTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Berge

BRIAN W CHELLGREN GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC101 S 5TH STLOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3157UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043providing assisted living facilities; providing independent living residences and living facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 9, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 9, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 25, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 9, 2011GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 9, 2011GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 9, 2011CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 4, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 4, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 4, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 4, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance