USPTO serial 77782232
ONE LOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE LOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini, Esq.
Jill M. Pietrini, Esq. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600Los Angeles, CA 90067-6017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; catering; coffee bars; health resort services, namely, providing food and lodging that specialize in promoting patrons' general health and well-being; hotel services; providing advice to tourists and business travelers on hotel and restaurant destinations; rental of beach chairs, towels and umbrellas for recreational use; resort lodging services; and wine bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 13, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |