USPTO serial 77784484
ENGINE 2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENGINE 2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel R. Scardino
Daniel R. Scardino Reed & Scardino LLP301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1250Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Meal replacement bars, drinks, powders, shakes and snacks; meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; vitamins, mineral supplements, nutritional supplements, dietary supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Bottled water, flavored waters and non-carbonated beverages, namely, non-alcoholic fruit beverages, non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor, and non-alcoholic vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |