USPTO serial 77785365
DURACARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DURACARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew L. Goldstein
ANDREW L. GOLDSTEIN FREEBORN & PETERS LLP311 S WACKER DRIVESUITE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6679Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Film-laminated non-magnetic promotional cards in the nature of discount cards or coupons mounted on direct mailers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |