USPTO serial 77785680
A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software system for video and media based networks comprised of graphical user interface software, video creation software, video editing software, speech to text software, and video optical character recognition software for use in customer service, knowledge management and E-commerce systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |