USPTO serial 77788340
ROOFARMOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROOFARMOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Old Hickory, TN
Old Hickory, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond O. Linker, Jr.
RAYMOND O. LINKER, JR. ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28280-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | semi-finished non-woven flexible sheet material made of spunbonded man-made fibers used in building and construction, namely, as a house wrap, basement wrap; non-woven flexible sheet material made of spunbonded man-made fibers for use in building and construction, namely, as a house wrap and basement wrap | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | non-woven textiles made of synthetic fibers for use in the building industry; non-woven flexible sheet material made of spunbonded man-made fibers for use in building and construction, namely, non-metal flashing and roofing underlayment | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | non-woven textile fabrics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fiberweb, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fiberweb, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ROOFARMOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |