Drawing for SMART FEED

USPTO serial 77789444

SMART FEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART FEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron K. McClellan

AARON K. MCCLELLAN MURPHY PEARSON BRADLEY AND FEENEY88 KEARNY ST FL 10SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108-5568UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing business information in the field of business management and business administration; business management consultation; business administration consultation, all provided in person, online and via the Internet; development of Internet marketing strategies and marketing analysis servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 24, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Apr 13, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 13, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 18, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 11, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance