USPTO serial 77789640
THE ZERO EMISSION GENERATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ZERO EMISSION GENERATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brighton, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIM BAKER
TIM BAKER SMUGLERS LLP480 LISGAR STOTTAWA, K1R5H3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (1) Power generation equipment and machinery, namely, wind turbines, solar power generation machinery, biomass power generation machinery, and renewable power generation machinery; (2) Clothing, namely, casual clothing and business clothing, and footwear, namely, casual footwear and athletic footwear; (3) Appliances, namely, small electric kitchen appliances, large kitchen appliances, and laundry appliances; (5) Confectionery, namely, chocolate, granola bars, and energy bars; (6) Condiments, namely, chutneys, honeys, jams, mayonnaises, mustards, nut butters and spreads, compotes and confits, relishes, salad dressings, gourmet salt, gourmet pepper, flavored cooking oils, and flavored cooking vinegars; (7) Breakfast cereals; (8) Frozen prepared meals; (9) Vegetables and fruits; (10) Snack foods, namely, potato chips, tortilla chips, edible nuts, and baked goods, namely, breads, cakes, pastries, tarts, pies, and muffins; (11) Publications in printed and electronic formats, namely, books, manuals, reports, newspapers, magazines, newsletters, and brochures, all in the field of renewable resources; (12) Promotional items, namely, coffee mugs, water bottles, pens, writing pencils, note cards, greeting cards, postcards, key chains, novelty buttons, and cloth tote bags; (13) Land development services; (14) Real estate services; (15) Contracting and construction services for wind farms, renewable energy facilities, and commercial and residential buildings; (16) Contracting and consulting services for the operation and management of buildings that use renewable energy; contracting and consulting services for the operation of heavy machinery for construction purposes; contracting and consulting services for custom manufacturing of automobiles, trucks, busses, trains, boats, airplanes, and helicopters; (17) Energy services, namely, the generation, production, wholesale and retail distribution of electricity and fuels for use in transportation and stationary power markets; (18) Financial services, namely, the provision of financial certificates, renewable energy certificates, carbon credits, saving accounts, pension funds, loans, private placements, futures, shares, membership interest, stocks, and stock options; (19) Brokerage, sale, and exchange of renewable energy credits; (20) Operation of a website providing information in the field of renewable energy projects and products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |