USPTO serial 77790442
JOIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
David J. Davis BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 E. Randolph StreetSuite 5000CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobile parts, namely, wheels, wheel hubs, wheel hub shields, wheel rim covers, hub cap covers; car seat headrests, child safety seats for car use, car seat covers, seat covers used in vehicles, fenders, fenders for bicycles, fenders for motorcycles/scooters; trailer baskets for bicycles, baskets for bicycles; baby carriages, folding baby carriages, lightweight baby carriages, baby carriage canopy, folding baby carriage canopy, lightweight baby carriage canopy, baby carriage hood, folding baby carriage hood; inner tube tires, tires, vehicle solid tires, car tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal safety gates for babies, non-metal playpens for babies, rocking chairs, baby rocking beds, cradles, wooden bedstead, chairs, seats, chairs with arms, baby high chairs, child high chairs, baby walkers, mattresses except linen products, cushions for fenced baby playground, backrest cushions, pillows, cushioned chairs, non-metal containers for transporting powder milk; baby sleeping bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | baby bathtub, portable baby bathtub, non-metal baskets of wood, cloth or wicker | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Swings, baby swings, toy baskets designed to be attached to a baby swing, game apparatuses and toys, namely, mobiles that hang over infant carriers, not to include teddy bears and not to include dolls and doll accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOIE INTERNATIONAL CO., LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by JOIE INTERNATIONAL CO., LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named JOIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |