Drawing for AIMS

USPTO serial 77790664

AIMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah M. Robertson, Esq.

Sarah M. Robertson, Esq. Dorsey & Whitney LLP51 West 52nd StreetNew York, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Educational publications, namely, elementary school, middle school and secondary school level workshop handouts, activity books, and magazine in the fields of math and scienceACTIVEAug 1, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 28, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 14, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 10, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 12, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 15, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 15, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance