Drawing for BLACK WATCH

USPTO serial 77791895

BLACK WATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACK WATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Lynch

ROBERT A. LYNCH HAYWORTH, CHANEY & THOMAS, P.A.202 N HARBOR CITY BLVD STE 300MELBOURNE, FL 32935-7309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial affairs, namely, banking services, credit and debit card services, issuing of travelers' checks, stock exchange quotations, deposits of valuables, namely, safe deposit box services, securities brokerage, financial information, financial analysis, financial consultancy, financial sponsorship of educational, sporting, cultural and charitable events, financing services, exchanging money, capital investments, loan financing, financial management, safety deposit box services; real estate management, namely, management of golf facilities and golf resortsACTIVE—
042Design and development of games played on electric or electronic devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 23, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance