Drawing for PAWS 4 CLAWS BETTER TOGETHER.

USPTO serial 77793706

PAWS 4 CLAWS BETTER TOGETHER.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAWS 4 CLAWS BETTER TOGETHER.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Russell

JOHN E. RUSSELL ALLMARK TRADEMARK4041 SUGAR MAPLE DRIVESUITE ADANVILLE, CA 94506

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring gifts and giftware, clothing, bedding, pillows, towels, housewares, collectible artwork, jewelry, candles, novelty items, desk accessories, furniture, and lamps; Providing on-line information in the fields of employment counseling, personnel recruitment, career networking, employment opportunities, job classified ad listings and resume preparation; Providing on-line employment placement services, namely, resume matching services for prospective employees and employers via a global computer networkingACTIVE—
036Charitable fundraising servicesACTIVE—
038Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for the transmission of messages among users in the fields of pets and general interest; streaming of audio and video material on the InternetACTIVE—
042Website design services; Computer services, namely, hosting online web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings and interactive discussions; and computer services in the nature of customized web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles and information and gives computer users the ability to upload, exchange and share videos, audio files, and photosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance