USPTO serial 77793986
M2FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M2FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | (Based on Intent to Use) Computer program manuals for developing and maintaining software (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Computer program manuals for developing and maintaining software | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2009 |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in creating UML models and building HTML mock-ups.; Computer code conversion for others; Computer programming; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Consultancy in the field of software design; Creating of computer programs; Creating, maintaining, and modernizing computer software; Customization of computer hardware and software; Data conversion of computer program data or information; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Design, creation, hosting and maintenance of internet sites for third parties; Design, development and implementation of software; Maintenance of computer software; Providing a web site that features information on computer technology and programming; Repair of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of creating UML models and building HTML mocks-ups; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Technological consultation in the technology field of developing and maintaining software programs; Updating and maintenance of computer software; Updating of computer programs for third parties; Updating of computer software for others(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in creating UML models and building HTML mock-ups.; Computer code conversion for others; Computer programming; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Consultancy in the field of software design; Creating of computer programs; Creating, maintaining, and modernizing computer software; Customization of computer hardware and software; Data conversion of computer program data or information; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Design, creation, hosting and maintenance of internet sites for third parties; Design, development and implementation of software; Maintenance of computer software; Providing a web site that features information on computer technology and programming; Repair of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of creating UML models and building HTML mocks-ups; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Technological consultation in the technology field of developing and maintaining software programs; Updating and maintenance of computer software; Updating of computer programs for third parties; Updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2010 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |