USPTO serial 77794401
TITANIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITANIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth F. Janda
ELIZABETH F JANDA BROOKS KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automobiles | ACTIVE | Feb 23, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |