Drawing for HERITAGE·PIONEER CORPORATE GROUP

USPTO serial 77794704

HERITAGE·PIONEER CORPORATE GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HERITAGE·PIONEER CORPORATE GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory B. Phillips

GREGORY B. PHILLIPS KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Packaging materials for industrial and commercial use, namely, paper and cardboard bags, boxes, containers, and cartons; paper for wrapping and packaging; padded paper blankets for use in packing; cushioning and padding made of paper for packing use; corrugated paper and cardboardACTIVE—
017Plastic films for industrial or commercial wrappingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 16, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 16, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 14, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 14, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 28, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 6, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 6, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 6, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance