USPTO serial 77796647
I-SERVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-SERVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen S. Ashley, Jr.
STEPHEN S. ASHLEY, JR. ASHLEY LAW FIRM P.C.3440 TORINGDON WAY STE 205CHARLOTTE, NC 28277-3191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installing security systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services, namely, protecting people, property and assets for businesses and governmental agencies by providing security assessments, developing and implementing customized business solutions for improving security and preventing criminal activity, providing audio and video monitoring of premises, providing discreet monitoring of employees of businesses and governmental agencies for security purposes, alarm response and verification services, namely, providing announced monitoring of premises alerting persons on the premises of the monitoring, responding to alarm activations, and determining the cause of alarm activations; security services, namely, providing real-time voice interaction with persons on the premises via speakers and microphones, conducting visual operational audits of premises, and escorting employees walking to and from their vehicles by conducting audio and video monitoring of the employees and providing simultaneous voice interaction with said employees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |