Drawing for CHEEZBURGER

USPTO serial 77797471

CHEEZBURGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEEZBURGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Venkat Balasubramani

VENKAT BALASUBRAMANI FOCAL PLLC8426 40TH AVE SWSEATTLE, WA 98136-2350UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035online retail store services featuring humorous merchandiseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 7, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 24, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 24, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 23, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance