Drawing for UFC ULTIMATE HOLD 'EM

USPTO serial 77797673

UFC ULTIMATE HOLD 'EM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UFC ULTIMATE HOLD 'EM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer K. Craft; Michael N. Feder; and Robert B. Kouchoukos

Jennifer K. Craft; Michael N. Feder; and Robert B. Dickinson Wright PLLC8363 West Sunset Road, Ste. 200Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment and gaming services, namely, providing live games of chance and live card games; entertainment and gaming services, namely, providing online games of chance and online card games;entertainment services, namely, conducting gaming contests and tournaments, and providing a website featuring computer gamesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 24, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2012MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2012ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 25, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 10, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance