Drawing for SIMPLEX SPACERX

USPTO serial 77797674

SIMPLEX SPACERX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLEX SPACERX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M. Palisi

THOMAS M. PALISI LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP600 SOUTH AVE W STE 2WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010SYSTEM FOR FORMING A TEMPORARY ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT COMPRISING MOLDS FOR ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS FOR USE IN TREATING INFECTIONS OF THE AREA OF PROSTHETIC ATTACHMENT; IMPLANT TRIALS FOR VERIFYING A FIT BETWEEN THE SURGICAL SITE SIZE AND THE IMPLANT SIZE; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS; STORAGE TRAYS SPECIALLY DESIGNED FOR TRANSPORTING AND HOLDING ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS AND RELATED DEVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance