USPTO serial 77797758
V-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with V-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Harsewinkel, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Striker
MICHAEL J. STRIKER STRIKER, STRIKER & STENBY103 E NECK RDHUNTINGTON, NY 11743-1567UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machine and devices, namely, combine harvesters, forage harvesters, bailing presses, tractors, agricultural transporters, self-loading forage wagons, agricultural cutters, impellers and swathers, plows, soil-working machines ,sowers, machines for applying fertilizers, pesticides and agricultural control chemicals, and parts and components for all of the above | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles, vehicles for travel across land, air and water; tractors, and parts and components for all of the above | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |