USPTO serial 77798419
LEVEL8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEVEL8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Mandel
LAWRENCE D. MANDEL GERTNER, MANDEL & PESLAK, LLCP.O. BOX 499LAKEWOOD, NJ 08701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PHONE CASES, PHONE SLEEVES, BAGS DESIGNED FOR CARRYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, CAMERA CASES, CAMCORDER CASES, CAMERA POUCHES, CAMERA BAGS, CAMERA SLEEVES, SOLD THROUGH CONSUMER ELECTRONICS RETAILERS AND OFFICE PRODUCTS RETAILERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 10, 2011 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |