Drawing for BIZILLA.COM

USPTO serial 77798672

BIZILLA.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIZILLA.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robin C. Vance

ROBIN C. VANCE MCGUIREWOODS LLP901 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4063UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for analyzing business data used to match potential buyers and sellers of businesses in the field of business acquisitions; downloadable computer software for analyzing business data used to match potential buyers and sellers of businesses in the field of business acquisitionsABANDONED—
042Providing an online network service that enables users to share business data and information for the purpose of facilitating business acquisition matchesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 24, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance