USPTO serial 77798723
GREGIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREGIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Schwäbisch-Gmünd, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
GEORGE A. PELLETIER, JR. CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH ST FL 22HARTFORD, CT 06103-1221UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely, plastic figurines, plastic animals and flexible figurines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |