USPTO serial 77798754
RACE AGAINST TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RACE AGAINST TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Louisville, KY
Louisville, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Berge
AMY B. BERGE GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC101 S FIFTH SREET3500 NATIONAL CITY TOWERLOUISVILLE, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; providing computer games accessed network-wide by network users; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable electronic games accessible online or via mobile devices; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games and competitions accessed via the internet or mobile devices; provision of information in the field of casual electronic computer and video games provided via the internet; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable electronic games and video games featuring weight loss, dieting, health, wellness, nutrition, physical activity and physical fitness themes; providing a website featuring information on exercise and fitness; providing online information in the fields of exercise and physical fitness through a website featuring digital media in the form of video games and virtual worlds and interactive learning application; providing on-line computer databases and searchable databases featuring information regarding exercise and fitness; providing on-line searchable databases in the field of video gaming | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | providing information in the field of weight loss, dieting, health and nutrition; providing online information in the fields of weight loss, dieting, health, wellness, and nutrition through a website featuring digital media in the form of video games and virtual worlds and interactive learning applications; providing on-line computer databases and searchable databases featuring information regarding weight loss, dieting, health, wellness, and nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |