Drawing for RACE AGAINST TIME

USPTO serial 77798760

RACE AGAINST TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RACE AGAINST TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY B. BERGE

AMY B. BERGE GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC101 S FIFTH SREET3500 NATIONAL CITY TOWERLOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to create and share multimedia content and engage in social networking; computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the user to publish and share their own content and images on-line; computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to participate in competitions, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking; creating and hosting mobile telephone-based and internet-based communities in which users may locate and communicate with other users, participate in chat rooms and discussion forums, review and comment on blogs, find friends, engage in social networking, send and receive e-mails, text messages, video messages, and instant messages, create and customize profiles, wallpapers and images, receive advertisements, purchase goods and services, and access on-line and mobile content; computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions and competitions, showcase their skills, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, engage in social networking all featuring weight loss, dieting, health, wellness, nutrition and physical fitness; computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking featuring weight loss, dieting, health, wellness, nutrition and physical fitness; providing a website that gives computer users the ability to upload, exchange and share photos, videos and video logs in the fields of weight loss, dieting, health, wellness, nutrition and physical fitness; computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, and engage in social networking concerning weight loss, dieting, health, wellness, nutrition, physical fitness, and video games; providing a web site that gives computer users the ability to upload and share user-generated videos, photos, and articles on a wide variety of topics and subjectsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 22, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 5, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance