Drawing for EQUINOX ARCHITECTURAL PERFORMANCE LIGHTING

USPTO serial 77799919

EQUINOX ARCHITECTURAL PERFORMANCE LIGHTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQUINOX ARCHITECTURAL PERFORMANCE LIGHTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas I. Rozsa

THOMAS I. ROZSA ROZSA LAW GROUP LC18757 BURBANK BLVD STE 220TARZANA, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011RECESSED ELECTRICAL LIGHTING FIXTURESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 10, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 11, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Feb 24, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 24, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 28, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance