Drawing for COHIBA'S BREW BONES

USPTO serial 77800286

COHIBA'S BREW BONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COHIBA'S BREW BONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Dog treatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 1, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2011PRRGPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2010PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2010PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 10, 2010PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 10, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 4, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2009GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2009GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2009NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance