Drawing for XEPHNET

USPTO serial 77800765

XEPHNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XEPHNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Whitelaw

JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRL NSTE 310NAPLES, FL 34103-3586

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for providing access to a global computer network; computer software for delivering content, namely, third-party web content, streaming media and software applications to end users; computer hardware, namely, computer servers for hosting third party web content, streaming media and software applications; authentication software used to verify personal identification for financial transactions; computer software for use in electronic authorization, processing and management of card present and card not present credit card, debit card and electronic check transactions conducted via a global computer networkACTIVE—
038Data and electronic media transmission services via on-line global and local computer networks of third party content, namely, electronic transmission of video, music, games, photos, HTML source, dynamic web content and digital media from a content delivery networkACTIVE—
042Data conversion of computer network data or information, namely, integrating third party web content, streaming media and computer applications for delivery from a content delivery network; replication of third party data across a computer network, namely, data conversion of computer network data or information; computer services, namely, monitoring and reporting on the point of origin of Internet traffic; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; data mining and warehousing; and providing electronic verification of on-line orders of digital content and generating electronic permission codes which then allow users to access said digital content; design and development of computer hardware and software; and Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, researching, analyzing, reporting, and maintaining applications, software, websites, and databases of others. Computer programming in the medical field; Computer programming and software design; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Data encryption and migration services; Providing customer-defined generated content and content of others automatically selected and customized based on the known or estimated geographical location of an Internet, mobile telephone or other wired or wireless digital network based customerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 15, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance