USPTO serial 77800786
P
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine Koyanagi
11301 W. Olympic Blvd., #324LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1653UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All purpose carrying bags, sports bags, duffel bags, backpacks, shoulder bags, bags for travel, luggage bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 11, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |