Drawing for CONTWIX

USPTO serial 77801127

CONTWIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHINER, MARK W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTWIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven S. Fang

STEVEN S. FANG DORSEY & WHITNEY, LLP250 PARK AVE FL 15NEW YORK, NY 10177-1500UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in connection with organizing, accessing, displaying and reading online content and serving and displaying online advertisementsACTIVE—
035Advertising and marketing; Development, operation and administration of digital signage systems and digital advertising systems for others, namely, providing advertising space by electronic means and global computer information networks; On-line advertising and marketing servicesACTIVE—
038Computer aided transmission of information and images; Electronic transmission of messages and data; Message collection and transmission; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the web site user to other local and global web pagesACTIVE—
042Computer services in the nature of customized web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles and information; Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; Providing a website featuring a media aggregator and search engine for internet content; Providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and on-line web links to other web sitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2013UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 25, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance