Drawing for QUINTS

USPTO serial 77801569

QUINTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUINTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard F. Mandelbaum

HOWARD F. MANDELBAUM LEVINE & MANDELBAUM222 BLOOMINGDALE RD STE 203WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605-1513UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009prerecorded audio and video tapes featuring children's stories, motion picture excerpts, and motion picture soundtracks; DVDs featuring children's stories, motion picture excerpts, and motion picture soundtracks; and eye glass framesACTIVE—
016story books, children's books, comic books, coloring books, trading cards, posters, calendars, sheet music, stickers, printed paper invitations, removable decal tattoos, photograph and scrapbook albums, and writing instruments, namely, pens, pencils, and markersACTIVE—
018umbrellasACTIVE—
021lunch boxes, tooth brushes, drinking glasses, and dishesACTIVE—
030ice cream, cookies, ready-to-eat breakfast cereal, and processed cereal, cakes, edible ices, cereal-based snack food and chewing gumACTIVE—
032carbonated soft drinks, non-carbonated soft drinks, and fruit juicesACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, production of motion picture films, television and radio programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 19, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Aug 18, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance