USPTO serial 77801931
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcia A. Auberger
MARCIA A. AUBERGER VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1607UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for recommender systems, namely, used for recommending electronic goods to consumers; software to enable reviewing, rating, dismissing, tagging, sharing, or otherwise connecting a user with electronic media and/or online content containing items of interest to the user, such as documents, links, web pages, graphic and audiovisual content, advertisements for goods and services of others available for purchase by the user and webpages facilitating purchase of goods and services of others available for purchase by the user, via the Internet or other wireless communication network; software to enable collecting, assembling, analyzing, searching, compiling, indexing, and organizing data, namely, information input by, or collected from, a user into a user interface about the user's interests and preferences, which is used to identify and recommend electronic media and/or online content containing items of interest to the user, such as documents, products, links, web pages, graphic and audiovisual content, advertisements for goods and services of others available for purchase by the user and web-pages facilitating purchase of goods and services of others available for purchase by the user, via the Internet or other wireless communication network; application programming interface (API) for third-party software in the field of recommender systems and for allowing data retrieval, upload, access and management via the Internet or other wireless communications network; Computer software to enable collecting, assembling, analyzing, searching, compiling, indexing, and organizing information which is used to recommend or suggest electronic goods of interest to users via the Internet or other communication network; Computer software for use as a web-based application programming interface (API) for third-parties used for recommending electronic goods to consumers and for allowing data retrieval, uploading, accessing and managing electronic products and price, usage and warranty information about the electronic products via the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising and promoting the goods and services of others via the Internet or other communications network; Advertising services, namely, providing an online website where content providers can interact with users for advertising, on behalf of themselves and others, and for evaluating and rating electronics goods; dissemination of advertising via the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engine services or providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and on-line web links to other web sites; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for collecting, assembling, analyzing, searching, compiling, indexing, and organizing information which is used to recommend or suggest electronic goods of interest to users via the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |